David Walter updates and Malcolm Frazer warning

 

 

 

  Whistleblower David Walter being persecuted for court costs, unpaid rates across QLD

by cairnsnews

CALLING ALL PATRIOTS TO TRAVEL TO HERBERTON IN FAR NORTH QLD – urgent unlawful State Government seizure of house and land. David Walter needs 1000 able men prepared to help prevent the unlawful seizure of his property by Queensland Inc. Buses will be organised to depart from Cairns on a daily basis. Those travelling by […]

Read more of this post

cairnsnews | March 31, 2016 at 4:20 pm | Tags: Corrupt Judicial, David Walter, enforcers called in, Great Bigfoot, judicial corruption, Qld Supreme Court Chief, Queensland government dictatorship | Categories: Courts, People Control, Queensland Politics | URL: http://wp.me/p2dFb5-1Mp

Comment    See all comments

 

 

 

 

 

 

  David Walter defies lower court judgement demanding the High Court file his application

by cairnsnews

Read the full document [HERE]

Read more of this post

cairnsnews | April 21, 2016 at 9:46 am | Tags: David Walter, government corruption, rights violation | Categories: big brother, Corporate Government, corruption, Local News, Politicians, Queensland Politics, treason | URL: http://wp.me/p2dFb5-1P2

Comment    See all comments

 

 

 


Change your email settings at Manage Notifications.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
https://cairnsnews.org/2016/04/21/david-walter-defies-lower-court-judgement-demanding-the-high-court-file-his-application/



You need to review your knowledge of the current Law Enforcement Security changes in our country since 2005. The following excerpt FYI :-

 

A secret state without any safeguards by former Prime  Minister Malcolm Fraser – Victoria University Library –

​20 October 2005

The new ASIO legislation overturns long-held concepts of basic justice.

(P4)

The ASIO legislation of 2002 underlines Australia’s official indifference to “due process” and to what until recently would have been regarded as universally accepted Rule of Law. We are the only democratic country, I am advised, to legislate for the detention of people whom the authorities do not suspect of any wrong doing or even of any wrong thought.

In Australia, any of us can be detained merely because authorities believe we might know something that we don’t even know we know. The authorities do not have to believe we are guilty of any crime, or are planning any crime, or have consorted with any suspicious persons.

How could such a law be drafted by the Government and supported by the Labor opposition?

You can be detained for one week but then on a new warrant, another and another and another week. Unless it is approved in the original warrant, and why would ASIO do that? – you are not allowed to contact your wife, your husband, your child, your mother, your father and of course not a lawyer.

If you don’t answer ASIO’s questions satisfactorily, you can be charged and subject to 5 years in jail. But the law is reasonable, it goes on to say that if you don’t know anything, then it’s not an offence not to tell ASIO anything!!! But you have to prove you didn’t know anything and so the “onus of proof” is reversed.

You can be asked to produce a paper and if you don’t, you also go to jail on prosecution for 5 years but the law goes on to say, being fair-minded again, if you don’t have such a paper, it’s not an offence not to produce it but you have to prove that you didn’t have it. How do you prove that you do not have something that you do not even know exists!!! Again, the “onus of proof” is reversed.

If a journalist heard that you had been detained and sought to report it, he would go to jail for 5 years. If a detained person were released and talked to anyone about his or her experiences, subject to prosecution, five years in jail.

This seems to be a law for secret behaviour by authorities, for making somebody disappear. It is a law that one would expect in tyrannical countries and not in Australia. Do we do nothing about it because we believe it will not apply to ourselves? Do we believe it is only going to apply to people of a different religion who look a bit different?

 

Comments are closed.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: