Update – 3 times NO to Local Gov’t

Every State created a Local Government Act AFTER the Australia Act 1986 for their sovereign, independent and federal nation. Therefore in the 1999 Referendum the People again said  NO – to Local Government

In the Local Government Acts they ESTABLISHED, the “Council”

Local Government Act 1995

Content and intent

1.3. (1) This Act provides for a system of local government
by —
(a) providing for the constitution of elected local
governments in the State;

(b) describing the functions of local governments;

‘‘local government’’ means a local government established
under this Act;

Division 2 — Local governments and councils
of local governments

Local governments created as bodies corporate
2.5. (1) When an area of the State becomes a district, a local
government is established for the district.
(2) The local government is a body corporate with perpetual
succession and a common seal.
(3) The local government has the legal capacity of a natural
person.

Therefore it should be able to be sued for money.

I repeat – the People said NO three times in 1974. 1988 and 1999

Is there a message in this ?
All four Canonical Gospels state that during Jesus’ Last Supper with his disciples, he predicted that Peter would deny knowledge of him, stating that Peter would disown him before the rooster crowed the next morning. Following the arrest of Jesus, Peter denied knowing him three times, but after the third denial, heard the rooster crow and recalled the prediction as Jesus turned to look at him. Peter then began to cry bitterly.[2][3] This final incident is known as the Repentance of Peter.[4]

Can you imagine the pollies and councilors weeping in shame cos they have three times denied the wishes of the people ??   yeah right !

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Here is the Penhallows Ruling. Please note that at the time of this ruling America operated upon English Law. The part that is of interest is the ruling itself wherein to paraphrase only artificial persons or entities can communicate with other artificial persons or entities. This ruling to date has in my comprehension been challenged or indeed overturned. It can be used in Australian Courts (such that they are)

U.S SUPREME COURT RULING –NO CORPORATE JURISDICTION OVER THE NATURAL MAN

Penhallow v. Doane’s Administraters (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54),

SUPREME COURT RULING – NO CORPORATE JURISDICTION OVER THE NATURAL MAN

Supreme Court of the United States 1795, “Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” S.C.R. 1795, (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54),

“For every thousand men who hack at the branches of evil, there is only one who is striking at the root.” Henry David Thoreau