Update on responses to Council letter

A great find –  thanks to Jason     Draft of a Bill to constitute the Commonwealth of Australia copy of federal constitution under the Crown as finally adopted by the Australasian Federal Convention at Melbourne in the colony of Victoria on the 16th March 1898. (1).pdf

https://larryhannigan.com/constitution-2/    scroll down to Item 01a


Regarding Council letter etc

Mike C wrote –  Larry, I am watching and learning little by little what Wayne has been going thru and what he is talking about.   Why did they destroy his house?   Did they try to burn it what?   How?

My reply –  Mike  –  I am sure you are aware of the depths of depravity that some people will sink to, to obtain wealth and power – but getting it illegally is dangerous if you get caught  right ?  but when you are protected by a legal system (note – legal, not lawful) then there are few limits to what one can  do –  As you are learning about the fraud in Government and the judiciary, you can see the opportunities available to thieves and liars.

In most cases, people do not pay rates cannot afford to, those who can pay are so dumbed down thinking councils actually do things lawfully (actually they don’t –The Federal Gov’t pays most, but that is another subject)   Nearly all rates $$ are for fat salaries and perks – and lately people are realising that rates are a scam.  So, when a landowner gets into trouble, he is easy prey to a council – rather, I should say councillor.

Remember that a “council” is only a piece of paper.  Councillors are flesh and blood individuals – An opportunity arises so they start a foreclosure on the property – they will call an “auction”, allegedly to recover the amount of rates owing.  Naturally the owner is not cooperative, and the councillors don’t want to get their hands dirty, so they hire thugs to go onto the property when the owner is absent, they steal valuables, sometimes trash the place (as burglars and thieves do) so the place is now un-livable for the owner who must then live elsewhere – thus the place is clear for auction.

But there’s more – the rates owing may be say $10k – the market value may be $100k   The place is “auctioned” for $50k so you would think the council would give the owner $40k  ??   that rarely happens – yes the real owner is now on the street and he may even have a mortgage of $50k which he is stuck with.

Other scenarios often happen – a councillor lusts after a local business or property such as  a weekend retreat with 20 cabins or so.  The “council”  will issue warning “notices” about anything or something on the property is not in accordance with Agenda 21 vegetation rules or some dreamed up infringement about building codes or the like – so the same antics as above are done, the auction goes ahead. and the property is bought for a song, not by the councillor of course, but perhaps by a relative or arms length friend.

These situations are common – even occasionally shown on Current affair TV shows, but there is rarely any follow up. –  Such are the people doing this to their neighbours daily. and yet, these hypocrites will sit in the pews weekly – and we are supposed to love them .. yeah right !!

Not all councillors are like that – many get on the council with noble intentions, but quickly discover that the unelected CEO is there to enforce the UN Agenda. He is paid from the same extortion $$ from ratepayers, and those councillors should realise that they are also sharing in that pool of extortion via their wages and perks.

Not many decades ago, being on the council was honourable – many drew no wages, only expenses – they ensured that essential services were maintained. If major infrastructure such a roads, railways, bridges etc was needed, it was decided by meetings and community discussions, and was generally financed from the Fed Govt – today the 38c/litre fuel tax of some $45B is far more than the $25B actually spent – where is the rest ??

Now you may know why I wrote these 2 items https://larryhannigan.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/5-what-laws-steam.pdf


No one must give up –  Luke 19.13 “occupy ‘til I return”  and   Eph 5.11 “expose evil”


Here’s another response which is quite sensible –

Larry: – I certainly don’t think we should pretend that nothing can or should be done and I encourage everyone to get a low liability case started and go to court, (eg parking fine or such)  write their own submissions and learn about how the system actually does work.  I just spent 2 years and $3000.00 on a bicycle helmet case.  From what I have learned about how the “courts” support any act of parliament under the guise of “Parliamentary Supremacy” I do not believe that there is remedy in the Australian court system.  It is broken and corrupt.  The courts are not the guardians of the Constitution any more, they are the lackeys of the Political Parties who appoint them and issue them their commissions under their Emu and Kangaroo corporate logo – (authority they do not have) or they sit in treason under the Crown Ensignia   However do not make the mistake that the courts do not have power.

The best possible chance for remedy at this time is the Privy Council.  Wayne is almost there and has spent years, countless hours and great personal sacrifice to get to this point with his case.  He has expenses coming up of travelling to the UK and filing in that court system and presenting his case.  He will need financial support to do this.  Wayne’s and Rod Culleton’s cases are the best cases in the system right now.  We need to support them financially and get behind their extraordinary efforts.  These cases could be historic victories in the common goal of restoring the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, the Common Law and Constitutional rule of law. Send to both Rod Culleton and Wayne Glew each $100.00 and thank them for their efforts in our behalf

Support Wayne and Rod –  Donate to  Wheylite Foundation, Wpac BSB 032563 Acc 354159 and put your name pls

My suggestion would be that you pay their rates under duress

Print this onto your Rates Notice or to add to when you pay  and be sure to include your signed Council letter. You never know, it may prick some staffer’s conscience.

Paid under Duress.jpg

Of course you are free to walk in front of a speeding truck at a pedestrian crossing if you are inclined that way. But many do care, so forward this and the council letter to everyone … and send yours today. The council may ignore you, but keep persisting demanding their proof of “authority”   Do not accept their quoting various Local Gov’t Acts – all are invalid from Referendum 1999.

Mike F


Larry – In regard to responses to the ratepayer letter, my local Member is going in to bat for a farmer who is working a couple of extra jobs just to pay his rates. I have informed her about the fact that Geelong has 67,000  Centrelink recipients and councils must consider the hardship provisions in their legislation.   The fact that Social Security legislation is involved in this means the local Federal Members have a role to play here, for Centrelink people, doesn’t it, Going to rev the local Members anyway,      Garry S


Larry, my appreciation is extended, as I liaise with Geoff xxxx in his fight with the

Case – West Coast Council – Land Parcel – Mining Lease attracting $380,000.00 per year Rates. Your support has given Geoff and I the confidence to Challenge the WCC and we have enjoyed one small success, the Burnie Court dropped it’s ruling relating to his outstanding Rates, because of a business name error picked up by me. Its back to square one and the WCC will table Geoff’s notice that they have to provide ‘Origin of Power’ and they must give evidence on where they received the authority to value the land.

Case – Alan Barnett (in Court) panel of 3 Judges, I’ve provided detail from your supplied copy of the C of A C Act 1901 that single or panel of Judges cannot levy costs, only a Jury can. Alan owes TasWater $10,000,00 + $17,000.00 costs, I keep you both informed.

Case – Noel & Andrea Jackman Land Tax; copy has been sent JC Root, again Info will be communicated as it progresses Claim $1.375 refund

Case – Alex Vanderkooij – Lawyer / Solicitor, property in Partnership sold, without two partners being advised that the WILL of the deceased did not include their Name or the Partnership. The Lawyer Firm being sued for complicity / concealment. Solicitor Firm failing to enter the Partnership into the WILL Court has stopped the Beneficiaries’ payout.

Case – Foresty ‘close down’ compensation claim ( $ 3.5 million ) case is with the Premier’s Dept.

Summary, I have through my contact list sent copy to all, hoping they will undertake the stance, that’s required. I’ve received responses indicating they will notify their Council/s , I’ll keep you posted.

Larry and Dick, you are aware I am just an average person, but with your combined help I have enjoyed my growth in my ability to challenge the believed ‘status-quo’, thank you both.  Love, Len B


Now for something completely different

1 – So you think you are clever with machines

2 – Simple explanation of 5G   (worse than you think) https://larryhannigan.com/world-events/29-5g-technology-ready-or-not/