Wayne’s Critics – take Note

A sincere someone sent this … containing a bunch of items, criticising Wayne’s work

He quoted – Glew v The Governor of Western Australia [2009] WASCA 123: 4 [Appeal] Glew v The Governor of Western Australia [2009] WASC 14: 5 [Trial] Glew issued a writ of summons on 28 August 2008 directed to the Governor of Western Australia.”  and stated – the Crown responds that it should be struck out. The Courts agree. This states that the courts have already decided this case Larry.

MY RESPONSE  

The Crown – Is the Crown of King David and continues down the line to the Throne today     Luke 1.32-33  He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David; and He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and His kingdom will have no end.  The House of David consists of the true Israelites

The Throne includes Jacob’s Pillar (the stone) regardless of who is on the Throne or claims to be above it.  The coronation Oath is to “uphold the Laws of God”.   His statement  “the Crown responds that it should be struck out”  is false … and of course  The “masonic” Courts agree

stone

and consider this symbolism – They only think they rule  because the sheeple let them – It’s time for the Lawful Rebellion – Magna Carta Sec 61. 

signs.jpg

and this – regardless your “opinion” of the speaker – listen to the 2 min message and pray for an Australian to do a similar one

https://videopress.com/embed/Ctaysb70?hd=0&autoPlay=0&permalink=0&loop=0

Here is an Affidavit the enemy must rebutt if your are hauled into any court

for the full article click on  https://larryhannigan.com/government-federal/18a-waynes-critics-take-note/

If you have problems opening it, go to larryhannigan.com   Federal Gov’t  Item 18a

 

 

 

 

 

x