18 – Wayne Glew – Affidavit, followup, the ongoing details of challenge all Courts, magistrates and Judges

This post is to give you a blanket Affidavit to challenge all Courts, magistrates and Judges and proves no Laws Acts or Statutes or Decisions of State Courts since 1973 have any value. Compliments of Wayne Glew – ex Police Prosecutor.   For full documentation of the facts Wayne refers to – see https://larryhannigan.com/australia/12-compiled-from-research-into-factual-evidence-of-treason-treachery-sabotage-of-commonwealth-of-australia/

                                           Affidavit

I, Your name  of the family name  of  address – no postcode, make oath and state as follows;

I, formally challenge the Jurisdiction of this court being what court in what State for the following reasons;

  • The UNIDROIT Treaty of ROME signed by the Attorney General under Gough Whitlam in 1973 without first obtaining the permission of the people, was an Act of Treason against the Australian People as were all the laws derived from it
  • The establishment of the Commonwealth as a Corporation along with the Australian Government and all the States as Companies was a further Act of Treason.
  • The recognition of Local Government Bodies called Councils and empowering them to control us and Our Land was not only Treason but it rendered all State Constitutions inoperative because they were repugnant to the Commonwealth Constitution contrary to section 106 of that Constitution.
  • This has the effect of making all states inoperative in law until such time as they correct their constitution and all their courts to sit inside the Commonwealth held to the Constitution and the Common Law which is the King James Bible.
  • The Australian Government must be indicted for Treason and this country returned to a Lawful Government under Our Constitution.
  • Every court in this country is bound to decisions of the High Court, like it or not and must comply with their rulings
  • Fejo v The Northern Territory HCA 58 of 1998 makes it very clear that so called Local Government is unlawfully controlling Our Property under the State Constitutions making the recognition of Local Government Unlawful as it is not recognised in the Commonwealth Constitution. Reference 106.
  • In James Andrew McGinty and Others v The State of Western Australia HCA 48 (1996) 186 CLR 140 20th February 1996. At 17 Section 106 of the Commonwealth Constitution reads, “The Constitution of each State of the Commonwealth shall, subject to this Constitution continue as at the establishment of the Commonwealth, or as at the admission or establishment of the State, as the case may be, until altered in accordance with the Constitution of the State.”

This section has a duel operation. Its first operation is to prescribe what the new elements of the Federal Polity – The States – shall be. When the people of the Australian Colonies were united in the Commonwealth of Australia by the proclamation made pursuant to covering Clause 3 and these Colonies become Original States of the Commonwealth by operation of covering Clause 6, the Colonies – the Old Constitutional Entities – required a new constitutional status. They become States, as the text of ss 107 and 108 shows, deriving their existence as States from the Commonwealth Constitution (39) Secondly. Section 106 conferred or the respective States Substantially the Constitutions of the Antecedent Colonies (31) The same Constitutions as had been conferred on the Colonies prior to 1st January 1901 were continued as the Constitutions of the respective States thereafter, subject to such modifications as were effected by the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (imp) and the Constitution of the Commonwealth, as Barwick CJ said in New South Wales v The Commonwealth (32) “On the passage of the Imperial Act, those Colonies ceased to be such and become States, forming part of the New Commonwealth, as States, they owe their existence to the Constitution which, by sub section 106 and 107, provides their Constitutions and Powers referentially to the Constitutions and Powers which the former colonies enjoyed, including the Power of Alteration of those constitutions. Those Constitutions and Powers were to continue by virtue of the Constitution of the Commonwealth.

  • As you can see the States and the Australian Government are operating Unlawfully and Without Authority.
  • Neither this Court, nor ANY State or Federal Court, or Government can fix the problem until all Parliaments in this and every State are established Lawfully and the Australian Government is dissolved and the Federal Government established under Our Constitution.
  • All Governors of States and the Governor General must be established under Our Constitution.
  • They must then set up the Lawful Executive Governments of each State and the Commonwealth.
  • Until that time there are no Lawful Courts and Governments in the States or at Federal level.
  • You are party to all the Offences revealed and have a conflict of interest and as such can not make any decisions or rule on the matters raised.
  • You, not me, have to take the challenge to the High Court to prove your authority.
  • The cases I have sighted prove your lack of authority.
  • No Parliament Can Override the High Court.

Your name  of the family name  of  address – no postcode                                                        Dated: Spell the words

Sign on the right hand side                            Signed:

                                                                                 All Rights Reserved

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

FRAUD DEFINITION : Deceit, deception, artifice, or trickery operating prejudicially on the rights of another, and so intended, by inducing him to part with property or surrender some legal right. 

Anything calculated to deceive another to his prejudice and accomplishing the purpose, whether it be an act, a word, silence, the suppression of the truth, or other device contrary to the plain rules of common honesty. 

An affirmation of a fact rather than a promise or statement of intent to do something in the future. 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

A letter to the individual who has ignored or refused to reply after you sent the above affidavit

Your address – xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  in the State of   xxxxx    no postcode

Date in words

NOTICE 

To the Office of the (their Title) eg C.E.O., heirs and successors

Company, Govt. Dept., etc.

Your silence stands as consent, and tacit approval, for the declarations of facts and conclusions here being established as fact, as a law matter and this affidavit absent timely rebuttal, will stand as final judgment in this matter.

Failure to reply with-in thirty (30) days, establishes you are in agreement with the foregoing and are thusly legally estopped pursuant to: Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932, 1906, silence activates estoppel.  

High Court results so far makes it very clear that so called Local Government is unlawfully controlling properties under the Australia Acts 1986 (Cw) and (UK)

Acts Interpretation Act 1954

“Australia Acts” means the Australia Act 1986 (Cw) and the Australia Act 1986 (UK).

Australia Act 1986 (Cwlth) was enacted UNDER the Political Parties definition of Australia to their statutory instrument Queen of Australia.

Australia Act 1986 (UK) was enacted to the Founding and Primary law Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 as Proclaimed and Gazetted.

Political Parties and Councillors sit under their own private Constitutions, Treason and Fraud combined.

I, Your Name Here, hereby reserve the right to amend this document, and am the only party authorized to assert the right to make amendments to this document as necessary, and in order that the truth may be ascertained and these proceedings justly determined.

Should any party possess information that will controvert and overcome this Declaration with specificity, please advise Me in writing by DECLARATION in AFFIDAVIT FORM within thirty (30) days from receipt hereof and thereby, provide Me with your timely rebuttal, proving with particularity by stating all requisite actual evidentiary fact and all requisite actual law, and at no time in reliance on mere presumptive facts and personal conclusions law, that this Affidavit by Verified Declaration is substantially and materially false sufficiently for changing materially my declaration.

The Undersigned, I, Your Name Here, do herewith declare, state and say that I, Your Name Here, issue this with sincere intent in truth, that I, the undersigned am competent by stating the matters set forth herein, that the contents are true, correct, complete, and certain, admissible as evidence, reasonable, not misleading, and by My best knowledge, by Me, the undersigned.

This document and all others pertaining to this issue may be recorded and thusly may be used at the discretion of its issuer for any and all matters as so allowed.

By my hand, this eighth day of March, 2018, 

Your name  of the family name  of  address – no postcode                                                        Dated: Spell the words

Sign on the right hand side                            Signed:

                                                                                 All Rights Reserved

 

 

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Below – 2 x items as presented to the courts by Wayne

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

a)  Notice to The Magistrates Court Geraldton Western Australia

I, Wayne Kenneth of the family Glew, CPO,OWB Commonwealth Public Official.

Did on the 7th of March 2018, Lawfully and Formally Seize the Company known as the City of Greater Geraldton ABN 55 987 667 173, under the authority granted by Clause 61 of Magna Carta.

Any and all perceived authority to prosecute or control in any way The People of Western Australia, or Their Land is Formally Withdrawn by the Notice of Seizure until the City of Greater Geraldton proves in the High Court, its authority to exist under the Commonwealth Constitution Act UK and the Commonwealth Constitution 1901.

I Formally Withdraw all prosecutions before this and every court in Western Australia. Until their authority is proven to exist by the High Court of Australia in accordance with chapter 3 of the Commonwealth Constitution.

Ref page 795 of The Annotated Constitution.

Dated: 7th of March 2018

Wayne Kenneth of the family Glew CPO,OWB

Commonwealth Public Official

24 Hagan Road Glenfield

Geraldton Western Australia

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

b) Notice to the CEO of the City of Greater Geraldton. 

The Company known as the City of Greater Geraldton ABN 55 907 677 173

Has now of this date being the 7th of March 2018 been Formally and Lawfully Seized under the provisions of Clause 61 of Magna Carta.  

The Company known as the City of Greater Geraldton is now held under the Crown by me Wayne Kenneth of the family Glew CPO,OWB Commonwealth Public Official.

Until such time as the authority for your company to exist, prosecute, tax, and control The Land belonging to The People of Western Australia is shown by the High Court to exist in law made pursuant to the Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900 UK and Commonwealth Constitution 1901.

Further the Company known as the City of Greater Geraldton, proves to the High Court that it has the authority to override decisions of the High Court and control The People of Western Australia

Dated: 7th of March 2018

 

Wayne Kenneth of the family Glew CPO,OWB

Commonwealth Public Official

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Updates March 15

From: Halliday, Luisa <Luisa.Halliday@justice.wa.gov.au>
Date: Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 8:58 AM
Subject: Judgment
To: “waynekenneth.glew@gmail.com” <waynekenneth.glew@gmail.com>

Good Morning Mr Glew,

Please find attached a copy of the judgment.  The Court will phone you at 9.30 am for his Honour to make formal orders.

Kind regards

Luisa Halliday

Associate to the Honourable Justice O’Brien

E-mail   luisa.halliday@justice.wa.gov.au

The attach    Wayne Judgement

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Wayne Glew <waynekenneth.glew@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: Judgment
To: “Halliday, Luisa” <Luisa.Halliday@justice.wa.gov.au>

Thank you for the document that you call a judgement…..it is not as you Mr O’Brian have not proved your ability to constitute a lawful court…..you never looked at nor gave any explanation as to how any previous decision of any state court had any authority……if you read any of the cases you would find that nothing was ever dealt with…all i got was nonsense to protect an unlawful government using unlawful laws……the Constitution of Western Australia was put in place by letters patent by Queen Victoria on the 29th of October 1900…at Federation the State Government put in place a Constitution with 32 sections missing from it……this State has never been lawfully constituted……meaning no courts, no parliament can be established until this happens……my lawful challenge to jurisdiction could not be heard by you and your statement that it could is not lawful…..you cannot justify your actions by using unlawful decisions of unlawful courts…….the Commonwealth Constitution demands that all officers of courts and all politicians swear the Oath contained in the Commonwealth Constitution.    In the high court HCA 44 of 2006 the High Court stated that no reference can be made to a judicial function except under Chapter Three of the Commonwealth Constitution Act 1901….further it stated that not only permanent judges but temporary judges must swear the Oath of Allegiance before swearing their oath of office…..Wayne Martin on the 21st of June 2011 stated that he had not sworn the Oath of Allegiance  nor did he have to…..no judge in this state has sworn the lawful oath…….no authority to exist….any and all judgements in this state are fraud and afford no obedience……you have not proved your authority…..you not me must take the matter to the high court….don’t believe that? … Read Chapter Three of the Commonwealth Constitution Act 1901

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

16th

I received a purported decision of a court by email at 9 am Thursday 15th of March 2018. This email contained all of my previous cases that I had put to our courts and claimed that my challenge had been dealt with in these cases. This opened every case up for scrutiny and authenticity.
They had none and the judge had no jurisdiction.

(1) Thank you for the document that you call a judgement.
It is not as you Mr O’Brian have not proved your ability to
constitute a Lawful Court. You never looked at nor gave any
explanation to how any previous decision of any State Court
had any authority. If you read any of the cases you would
find that nothing was ever dealt with. All I got was nonsense to protect
an Unlawful Government using Unlawful Laws. The Constitution of
Western Australia was put in place by Letters Patent by Queen Victoria on
the 29th of October 1900. At Federation the State Government put in place
a Constitution with 32 sections missing from it. This State has never been
Lawfully Constituted…Meaning No Courts No Parliament can be established
until this happens….My Lawful Challenge to Jurisdiction could not be heard
by you and your statement that it could is Not Lawful.
You cannot justify your actions by using Unlawful Decisions of
Unlawful Courts….The Commonwealth Constitution demands that all
Officers of Courts and all Politicians Swear the Oath contained in the
Commonwealth Constitution in the High Court 44 of 2006 the High Court
stated that no reference can be made to a Judicial Function except under
chapter Three of the Commonwealth Constitution. Further it stated that not
only permanent judges but temporary judges must Swear the oath of
allegiance before Swearing their Oath of Office. Wayne Martin on the 21st of
June 2011 stated that
“He had not sworn the oath of allegiance nor did he have to”
No Judge in this State has sworn the Lawful Oath.
No Authority to Exist….Any and all judgements in this State are Fraud
and Afford No Obedience…. you have not proved your authority.
You not me must take the matter to the High Court….Don’t believe that,
read Chapter Three of the Commonwealth Constitution.

(2) What happened in phone conversation

Transcript of the above video

Associate: – Mr Glew can you hear me

Wayne: – I am not Mr Glew, Its Wayne Kenneth of the family Glew, please use my name.

Associate: – OK I will just wait for the judge to enter the room

Associate: – Silence in the court 4018/2014 in matter of Glew

Judge: – Is the Applicant wife on the line – is everything OK.

Judge: – Is the Respondent husband on the line and can you hear me as well.

Wayne: – Very clearly and for the information of the court I am recording this for future reference.

Judge: – I am formally publishing my reason for my decision.

Judge: – You can make submissions

Judge: – First the wife,  do you wish to make submissions

My/Ex: – No your honour.

Judge: – makes offer to both of us to make submissions.

Wayne: – I said yes and everything that has taken place has no authority in law.
You have not answered my challenge to your jurisdiction and you
haven’t nor can you, I have lawfully challenged your court under
chapter 3 of the constitution. I have added a response to your
document that you sent me earlier. I suggest you read it before you go
any further. because you have no authority until it is proven in a
superior court, there are no lawful courts and you know it.
So you prove your jurisdiction or nothing you have to say has any
value in law.

Judge: – I have heard from you Mr Glew and now i pronounce orders…

Wayne: – I am not Mr Glew sir.

Judge: – Now I pronounce orders in terms stated paragraph 177

Wayne: – They will not be complied with until you prove jurisdiction.

Judge: – The court is now adjourned and I will end this call now..

Wayne: – Yeah I know you would

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Email of 16th continued

(3) I thank you for your call and the opportunity to talk. I again formally
Challenged the ability of Mr O’Brian to constitute a Lawful Court.
He conceded to the challenge and adjourned the court forthwith…
I thank you for adhering to the Lawful Challenge under chapter Three of
the Commonwealth Constitution to your ability to deal with this matter.
As I said you are required to put this matter to a court of competent
jurisdiction.

(4) The judge conceded he had no jurisdiction nor was the State lawfully
established. No Laws or Decisions of Courts exist until he now proves
jurisdiction. That requires him taking the cases to the High Court.

PLEASE SHARE TO EVERYONE….EVERYWHERE!