20 – Rod Culleton – 3 March 2019
Contrary to some emails being circulated about me … what is stated below are the true events … I have crossed out the false bits and added the facts in red … Rod Culleton
Most will know the story of Senator Rodney Culleton being ousted from the Senate in early 2017 the Parliament after the former president of the Senate elected to remove a Federal Senator by usurping powers of the parliament on the 11th January 2017.a losing battle for his Senate seat in the High Court of Australia sitting as the Court of Disputed Returns.
During this time Senator in exile, Rod Culleton has maintained he continues to be an constitutional elected Senator due to the procedural requirements set out in our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK), which he believed had not been followed.
Section 22 Commonwealth Constitution sets out that a third 19 members of the Senate must be seated and acting to form a quorum to hold any validity. With the passage of the Senate (Quorum) Act 1991, the Parliament has changed the quorum to one quarter of the total number of Senators, which with the current Senate size of 76, means that at least 19 Senators are required for a quorum. The Senate was not quorate the day the (hostile) referral was made in the Senate.
Senator Parry ignored this even after Sam Dastyari Senator Nick Xenephon made reference to the state of the chamber not being quorate and Parry denied leave of Senator Culleton’s request to adjourn the Senate to the next siting day. Senator Culleton successfully passed a motion which was seconded by Senator Jacque Lambie through motion 163, being a constitutional instrument passed in the majority on the 1st December 2016, recalling all matters back to the senate in order to have the matter dealt with by the House under s47 and s49 Constitution (acting as an estoppel on all referrals).
In August 2018, Senator Culleton faced Chief Justice Susan Kiefel in the High Court of Australia. which High Court, sitting as the Court of Disputed Returns and after hearing his argument, Kiefel CJ reserved her decision. for later. He was denied justice on the grounds he did not bring up s22 quorum from the beginning, outset, which in fact he did through affidavits which were dismissed by the full bench under s16 (3) (c) Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987.
In doing so, Kiefel CJ basically denounced our constitution having any validity, even after former Solicitor General David Bennett stated to Kiefel CJ that a stream cannot rise above its source. Kiefel CJ also failed to correct the mistakes of the unsafe orders made by the full bench on 7th December 2016 through misquoting a number of acts within the court of disputed returns judgement.
Senator Culleton became aware of the Commonwealth Constitution Report of 1988 and realised knowing too well that justice was never going could never be served in Australia and as the High Court, sitting as the Court of Disputed Returns was not available for parliamentary law making exercises, or for judicial sittings by a bona-fide Crown court. Furthermore, the purported referral from the Senate to enliven the jurisdiction was a falsehood. false was of the incorrect Crown. that being
The Commonwealth Constitution Report of 1988, clearly showed that the Queen of Australia vs the Queen of the United Kingdom which is considered is a legal nonsense being an adopted title not available for parliamentary law making exercise or for judicial exercise by the courts. so Senator Culleton set out to file in the UK where he had the jurisdiction of the Queen of the UK as per Cl 2 and Cl 5 Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900 (UK).
On the 16th January 2019, the High Court of Justice in London UK, accepted a filing on behalf of Senator Culleton’s and his team to commence proceedings to call Senator Culleton into the Queen’s jurisdiction of the UK to deal with the unconstitutional removal of a federally elected Senator of the 45th Parliament in order to address the constitutional instrument (motion 163) as stated above, invoked on 1st December 2016, which remains part-heard in the senate. Interim submissions were submitted to the registrar proving the UK had the jurisdiction to hear the application.
This is a historical step in our nation’s history for the restoration of the Commonwealth of Australia, which is clearly outlined in Senator Culleton’s Prayer to the House of Lords, to which Senator Culleton is very proud to call on the UK to uphold its binding commitments and to come in and constitutionally address the legislative power and judicature in the Commonwealth of Australia.
The question would arise as to what now with the Australia Act 1986, which attempted to remove our constitutional right to seek remedy in the UK, leaving us with the High Court of Australia as our final means of justice.
Does this new precedence prove the Australia Act as an invalid Act of the Australian Parliament? Yes, this has now paved the way to get justice to our rightful Queen and for the resurrection of our privy council to hold the Australian parliament to account as all Parliamentarians without the privy Council are above the law. No public court can enforce any law against a sitting member,until the other members of the House refer him/her after dealing with ss 22, 23, 47 and 49 Constitution and otherwise.
click to see the Prayer
click to see the Notice of Extracts – Queen and Crown
First & Final Constitutional Commission Reports 1988