Tag Archives: vaccines

2017 – June 23 WHY NO JAB NO PAY ?



‘No Jab No Pay’ – Big Pharma Behind Australian Mandatory Vaccines Push

Makia Freeman, Contributor

Waking Times

Australian mandatory vaccines are ever closer to becoming a reality – or perhaps they already are. The Australian Government has decided that it’s No Jab, No Pay policy wasn’t quite fascist enough, so it has upped the ante by going one step further. Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull is trying to forge a policy where parents with unvaccinated children will not be able to enroll them in public school! That’s right: it’s Australian vaccine fascism. No Jab, No Pay may also become No Jab, No Play if the PM and his Big Pharma wife, Lucy Turnbull, get their way.
Let’s take a further look at the push for Australian mandatory vaccines, keeping in mind the horrendous history of vaccines, which have injured, sterilized, paralyzed and killed countless people all over the world.

No Jab, No Play

The Independent reports in its article Unvaccinated children could be banned from attending preschool across Australia that Aussie PM Turnbull is pushing for Australian mandatory vaccines by making public education dependent upon vaccination rates:

“Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has written to state and territory leaders to push for nationally consistent laws to protect young children from disease.
He writes: “At our next Coag [Council of Australian Governments] meeting I propose we agree that all jurisdictions implement legislation that excludes children who are not vaccinated from attending childcare or preschool, unless they have a medical exemption.

“Vaccination objection is not a valid exemption. We must give parents the confidence that their children will be safe when they attend childcare and preschool.
“Parents must understand that if their child is not vaccinated they will be refused attendance or enrollment.””

When Turnbull writes “vaccination objection” above, he refers to what is known as the philosophical or religious objection or exemption, which is the right of the individual to refuse vaccination on the grounds that it goes against his or her philosophical (or religious) beliefs.

The cute phrase No Jab, No Play was used by Australian Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt. It sounds clever, however it disguises a horribly authoritarian objective of forcing parents to make the choice between poisoning their child with toxic vaccines or getting free public education – a choice which for most families would be very difficult given the high price of private education in Australia.

Like many nations with 2-party political systems, the Australian Left (the Labor Party) doesn’t offer any opposition to the push for mandatory vaccines. It was the outspoken Pauline Hanson who criticized Turnbull for this move, but she was (predictably) put back into place by the force of the Australian Medical Association.

Again from The Independent:
“Pauline Hanson was forced to apologise after she was criticised by the Australian Medical Association and others for suggesting vaccines were not safe and incorrectly claiming that parents could conduct their own tests to evaluate vaccination safety.
She told the ABC’s Insiders programme that successive governments had “blackmailed” people into having their children vaccinated because Australia has a policy of withholding childcare fee rebates and welfare payments from parents who do not have their children fully immunized.”

The article ‘No Jab, No Pay’ Policy Has A Serious Ethical Sting points out how this No Jab, No Pay policy hurts poorer Australian families:

“The “no jab, no pay” policy has harms beyond the physical: it may unfairly deny funds to people who already suffer from hardship. While much attention is given to the half of non-vaccinators who consciously refuse, people have failed to vaccinate for other reasons such as having an ill child, or being caught up in what may be an already difficult separated family situation.

People who do not vaccinate for reasons other than disagreement and concern tend to have lower household incomes (60% have a household income less than A$50,000) and lower education levels (34% have year ten or less education). Single-parent households are also over-represented in this sub-population – 21% versus 15% of families nationally.”

Big Pharma and Lucy Turnbull

If you think the PM is pushing vaccines because he cares deeply for the health of ordinary Australians, think again. Lucy Turnbull is chairman of the pharma corporation Prima Biomed and is the PM’s Big Pharma wife. She has worked closely with Big Pharma giants GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis.

The Sydney Morning Herald in 2015 reports that the Turnbulls were listed as “the third biggest shareholder” in Prima Biomed.

The 2 Assumptions Underpinning the Push for Australian Mandatory Vaccines
There are 2 fundamental assumptions behind Turnbull’s ploy.

The first assumption is that of herd immunity. I have discussed this concept in an earlier article entitled Herd Immunity vs. Viral Shedding: Who’s Infecting Whom?, but here’s the basic point: herd immunity is based on faulty logic and numerous assumptions. It assumes vaccines work, it assumes the vaccinated don’t carry disease and it assumes vaccine-induced immunity is as good as natural immunity. As it turns out, it may in fact be the vaccinated who are spreading the disease through viral shedding.

The second assumption is that the State or the Government has the power to force you to take any medicine it deems fit for the sake of “public safety”. Of course, protecting public safety is a legitimate function of Government, but where it gets tricky real fast is that dictators, autocrats and tyrants always (almost without exception) justify their draconian acts by claiming they are protecting the public. It’s always the same excuse. How many times have we heard the hackneyed phrase national security? At a certain point we have to evaluate whether it’s more important to preserve individual rights, liberty and sovereignty – or the “rights” of the abstract “group”. Who owns your body? You or the Government?
Here’s the bottom line: forcefully medicating people without their informed consent is a drastic and extremely coercive step, even if herd immunity were a completely watertight theory and even if every single vaccine were safe and effective – two rather big, fat and rotund “ifs”. However, the entire concept of informed consent is being watered down.

Informed Consent Under Attack

The push for Australian mandatory vaccines is more evidence that the concept of informed consent is under attack. As the Organic Prepper reports, the US Government is helping out Big Pharma in America by watering down informed consent even further. A new law was passed in December 2016 endorsing an informed consent waiver:
“A new law quietly passed last December contains a waiver of informed consent that eliminates the requirement of pharmaceutical companies to let you know if a medication or vaccine given to you or your child is experimental. Wow. One last Christmas surprise from President Obama.

This is according to Section 3024, “Informed Consent Waiver for Clinical Investigations” of H.R. 32, the “21st Century Cures Act.” Here’s the wording of the text:
Clinical testing of investigational medical devices and drugs no longer requires the informed consent of the subjects if the testing poses no more than minimal risk to the subjects and includes safeguards.

“Clinical testing” is not clearly defined. Furthermore, who the heck gets to decide what “minimal risk” is? The pharmaceutical companies? The FDA? Medical professionals? How incredibly patronizing.”

The truth is that mandatory vaccines go against the Australian Constitution, as well as ideals in the Hippocratic Oath and the Australian Medical Association’s Code of Ethics. However, those pushing the vaccine agenda have ways around this, such as by introducing fake health threats and health scares (e.g. the dreaded zika virus caused by a pesticide) to try to justify the imposition of quarantine laws:
“As a general rule, there are no diseases for which vaccination is compulsory for persons living in Australia. However … where cases of quarantineable diseases arise, quarantine officers have the power to require a person who is subject to quarantine to submit to vaccination or prophylaxis if this is considered necessary to prevent the spread of the disease or is specified in the International Health Regulations. The Quarantine Act 1908 (Cth) was amended in 2008 to meet certain requirements under the International Health Regulations (2005) for vaccinations and other health measures related to travelers.”

Here is an excerpt from the Hippocratic Oath:

“With regard to healing the sick, I will devise and order for them the best diet, according to my judgment and means; and I will take care that they suffer no hurt or damage. Nor shall any man’s entreaty prevail upon me to administer poison to anyone; neither will I counsel any man to do so.”

Here is an excerpt from the Australian Medical Association’s Code of Ethics:
“Approach health care as a collaboration between doctor and patient.”
How exactly is mandatory vaccination a “collaboration”?

Conclusion: Beware of Creeping Soft Push for Australian Mandatory Vaccines
The No Jab, No Pay and No Jab, No Play are examples of creeping soft policy whereby the Australian Government is trying to coerce people into accepting vaccinations without trying to mandate it in law (which would be difficult, unconstitutional and result in pushback). So it’s using strong-handed tactics to mess with people using its services (welfare, public education) and get the vaccination rates higher through the back door. Informed consent is being constantly eroded, despite the fact it is cornerstone concept in medicine (and in law), because it recognizes the right of the individual to choose (or not choose) his own treatment. To allow governments and corporations to run roughshod over this right is to pave the way for medical tyranny. It is to allow collectivism to triumph over individualism. It is to allow third parties the legal right to dictate to you what you must put inside of your body.

Inform yourself and others around you about what adjuvants and ingredients are in vaccines.

See for yourself how monkey virus SV-40 was linked to the cancer-causing polio vaccine.

See for yourself how NWO agenda man Bill Gates admitted that vaccines lead to depopulation.

Governments only try to push mandatory vaccines on people who don’t know about them. How informed are you?

About the Author

Makia Freeman is the editor of The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com (FaceBook here), writing on many aspects of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects of the worldwide conspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity can create a new system of peace and abundance
**Sources embedded throughout article.
Like Waking Times on Facebook. Follow Waking Times on Twitter.

This article (‘No Jab No Pay’ – Big Pharma Behind Australian Mandatory Vaccines Push) was originally created and published by The Freedom Articles and is re-posted here with permission.


Mail June 20 2017

The subject of Vaccines is emotional and controversial –

thus a question must be raised –

If they are so good for us ALL, then why are those in power so determined that we must have them? and why the policy of No Jab = No Pay ?

Some of you do care for your kids and even for yourselves – note – there are already vaccines ready for pensioners and in fact, for anyone who gets any Gov’t handouts, same policy = No Jab = No Pay

Call me alarmist or nutter – that’s your freedom of speech right, but you may remember way back, (eons ago) 15 June 2017, if your memory goes back that far, I posted http://www.deagel.com/country/Australia_c0013.aspx and the plans to dramatically reduce Australia to 14 million population – How could that be done ??
below are just 2 methods, which do not include Fluoride, WIFI, Smart Meters …. all being actively enforced by the puppet Gov’ts and yes, even within your local council and medical centres …




I wonder why the repeat urgency now re gun ownership laws ? … that’s for next time when a brave non self centred insider comes out.
Soo … what can one do ???

Atheists and skeptics will pooh pooh all this – and pretend it all a conspiracy or such –
while Christendom clings to ‘fiction of the faith’ of just pray and it’ll all be okay. If that is your idea that Yahweh will provide all for you – why do you go to work ???
Nup,…Pray whilst you’re exposing evil, faith without works is death.

Mail June 15 2017

Mail June 15 2017
1 – Muslim sign … hoax ?
2 – Non Halal Australian Companies to support
3 – Vaccines … pro and anti
4 – Vaccines … big $$ for who ?

1 – In case some bleeding hearts thought the Muslim sign was a hoax, let’s hear from a local resident of Dearborn This was made in 2016, but nobody in the media wants to talk about it anymore.

2 – Non Halal Australian Companies


3 – Vaccines are also an emotional issue – In the past, some vaccines were accredited to stop polio, hepatitis, diphtheria and others. In those days, the ingredients were declared and they were tested for decades before they were released!! Today, it seems there is a vaccine ready before a “disease” is released?

3a – Dr. Oz No Flu Shots For My Kids!

3b – Why the push for no jab – no pay … Who makes heaps of $$$ out of vaccines in Australia ?

3c – Sweden has banned mandatory vaccines too


4 – Just Some of the Vaccine ingredients –

-Vaccine’s Safety: A Crime Against Humanity – 15mins ..
Dr. Sherri warns about the perils of vaccination


-The shocking truth about what’s really in vaccines: Mercury, MSG, Formaldehyde, Aluminium – 11mins

• c) Glyphosate Found in Childhood Vaccines By: GMI Reporter http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/glyphosate-found-childhoodvaccines The ever-present narrative that vaccines are perfectly safe is falling apart after testing shows that many childhood vaccines contain the carcinogenic chemical glyphosate.. To view the original, click Here….. Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s flagship herbicide Roundup and hundreds of other herbicides, has been found in vaccines …
• MMR II (Merk) vaccine had 2.671 parts per billion (ppb) of glyphosate
• DTap Adacel (Sanofi Pasteur) vaccine had 0.123 ppb of glyphosate
• Influenza Fluvirin (Novaris) 0.331 ppb of glyphosate
• HepB Energix-B (Glaxo Smith Kline) 0.325 ppb of glyphosate
• Pneumonoccal Vax Polyvalent Pneumovax 23 (Merk) had 0.107 ppb of glyphosate
The MMR II vaccine had levels up to 25 times higher than the other vaccines


Dr. Christopher Shaw is a neuroscientist at University of British Columbia and has been focusing his research on neurotoxicity of aluminum and ALS-parkinsonism dementia complex. Aluminum adjuvants are found in many vaccines, including Gardasil.

e) http://vaxtruth.org/2011/08/vaccine-ingredients/ **
in depth info in here worthwhile checking on INGREDIENTS **

f)http://www.salem-news.com/articles/november292011/vaccines-contaminated-se.php *gd info to check in here too.
(Pls note: IF you want more vaccine info ask me for Rosey’s contact) .. Larry


5 – SO WHY THE PUSH TO REDUCE THE POPULATION and how could it be done ?
By 2025 Australia’s population is planned to be reduced from 23 million to 14 million in 2025 … that’s 40% !
The negative forces are culling the herd !
Where are the Aussies going In the next eight years
Look at the Military budget too

Mail June 13 – Follow up to Mail June 11

Last mail I unfortunately did not do a BBC with the list of some names so I trust you will not betray the trust of those.

Also it appears that the article about the muslim sign in Dearborn Mitchigan may have been a fake/fake Snopes seems to have a history of putting out fake exposures of fakes if you know what I mean However, today when so many witnesses at events have mobile phone cams etc, we get footage which the MSM cannot obtain and if they do, they will not show eg

Below is a letter I received about the item re- Food Allergy boy in my last mail (which was shown on Channel 10, not the ABC) I have replaced names etc in italics – to protect the writer, not the guilty



Peace be unto you, I refer to our Brother John & Sister Mary, as to their son Joe effected term AUTISM caused by the VACCINE, Two Doctors washed their hands of it, they preferred the gifts from the medico salesman to be more important than HUMAN LIFE, The EVIDENCE is extensive, the Government offered compensation via AUTISM ASSOCIATION for the parents. They had so called Professionalism treating their son as if he is 2 years old, they pulled him out, due the DUMBING DOWN OF EDUCATION they experienced, The parents are doing better than the so called Professionals. They have 4 Children, Joe being the oldest, both John and Mary provided written material in COMMON LAW, they have been well looked after.

Coming back to local issues, when speaking with parents, some High School Students are kept at home 4 days week, attend High once a week, due to holding up their hand to ask a question, they are classified as DISRUPTIVES, yes non-compliant to School Protocols, meaning the people do not read the fine print in CONTRACT LAW, as particular references where they have not provided DISCLOSURE, thus breaches CONTRACT LAW.

Fred Nerk, Principal at Thistown State High School, as I suggest, is a Jesuit, his lists he created as to who he wants targeted by Queensland Police Service are based upon HEARSAY. He being a former Police Officer knows how to make words to appear, a good Magician with word play, just SUGGESTIONS, even the local Churches have been advised of his UNETHICAL APPROACH in Society, School Teachers have been threatened with sackings, if they open their mouths to speak the truth, yes they have been BLACKMAILED, as the Minister for Education failed them, The internal Management network is corrupted, including those over him to protect, we have a Fred Whobody, Principal of Nearbytown State School and others who have been worded up, to protect their CORRUPTION called OFFICIAL CORRUPTION, If a Magistrate leans towards it, he or she is also is CORRUPTED.
Those in Thistown are having a hard time with their children being suspended from Primary & High School based upon HEARSAY, the truth is that CHILDREN are being BULLIED AT SCHOOL also within the CLASSROOM and teachers have NO AUTHORITY to deal with it, otherwise they will be sacked, The DUMBING DOWN OF EDUCATION is on the increase via the US MODEL. Allow the attached youtubes to fill in the bigger picture. If you consider SOLICITORS, they all take their Oath to look after the SHIP so it does not get damaged,

Consider the following points of reference, make up your mind:-

Had a Police Officer locally, worded up by a Satanist, as I suggest is involved in Human Sacrificing 4 times a year, won’t go into detail, but those we deal with who as I suggest, are involved from 33rd Degree and Higher control the ADMINISTRATION, as Jesuits defines the level in which are FACTS, not HEARSAY.
Now for the big picture

You asked for FACTUAL INFORMATION, then consider Commonwealth of Australia registered aboard the Military Vessel United States of America under the United States Security Exchange Commission being 4th Reich, this extends from the EGYPTIAN RITE aka Roman Empire, this comes back to the BARRACKS ACT 1890 – Scottish Rite – Roman Empire.

Scottish Rite was established in 1850 in Scotland, at the time, the duration refers to sail time, to and from Scotland from Military Vessel called “Commonwealth of Australia,” the General’s Post (Post Code) comes under it, each Community Globally is set up on the same infrastructure known as MILITARY CAMPS TO REST THE SAILORS, their law is based upon the PUBLIC, comes under MARSHAL LAW = LAWS OF THE SEA.

Registration of the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA aboard the Military Vessel United States Security Exchange Commission, then it is time to understand the information below, therein INFRASTRUCTURE can be seen clearly, the police now wearing DARK BLUE UNIFORMS confirms the truth that they moved deeper out to sea, meaning you are GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT, they are not aware they are employed by a Military Service aboard a Military Vessel.

U.S. Citizens Are Under Special Maritime and Territorial Jurisdiction

May 17, 2017
18 U.S. Code § 7 – Special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States defined

The term “special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States”, as used in this title, includes:
(1) The high seas, any other waters within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States and out of the jurisdiction of any particular State, and any vessel belonging in whole or in part to the United States or any citizen thereof, or to any corporation created by or under the laws of the United States, or of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof, when such vessel is within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States and out of the jurisdiction of any particular State.
(2) Any vessel registered, licensed, or enrolled under the laws of the United States, and being on a voyage upon the waters of any of the Great Lakes, or any of the waters connecting them, or upon the Saint Lawrence River where the same constitutes the International Boundary Line.
(3) Any lands reserved or acquired for the use of the United States, and under the exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction thereof, or any place purchased or otherwise acquired by the United States by consent of the legislature of the State in which the same shall be, for the erection of a fort, magazine, arsenal, dockyard, or other needful building.

(4) Any island, rock, or key containing deposits of guano, which may, at the discretion of the President, be considered as appertaining to the United States.
(5) Any aircraft belonging in whole or in part to the United States, or any citizen thereof, or to any corporation created by or under the laws of the United States, or any State, Territory, district, or possession thereof, while such aircraft is in flight over the high seas, or over any other waters within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States and out of the jurisdiction of any particular State.
(6) Any vehicle used or designed for flight or navigation in space and on the registry of the United States pursuant to the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies and the Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space, while that vehicle is in flight, which is from the moment when all external doors are closed on Earth following embarkation until the moment when one such door is opened on Earth for disembarkation or in the case of a forced landing, until the competent authorities take over the responsibility for the vehicle and for persons and property aboard
(7) Any place outside the jurisdiction of any nation with respect to an offense by or against a national of the United States.
(8) To the extent permitted by international law, any foreign vessel during a voyage having a scheduled departure from or arrival in the United States with respect to an offense committed by or against a national of the United States.
(9) With respect to offenses committed by or against a national of the United States as that term is used in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act
(A) the premises of United States diplomatic, consular, military or other United States Government missions or entities in foreign States, including the buildings, parts of buildings, and land appurtenant or ancillary thereto or used for purposes of those missions or entities, irrespective of ownership; and
(B) residences in foreign States and the land appurtenant or ancillary thereto, irrespective of ownership, used for purposes of those missions or entities or used by United States personnel assigned to those missions or entities.
Nothing in this paragraph shall be deemed to supersede any treaty or international agreement with which this paragraph conflicts. This paragraph does not apply with respect to an offense committed by a person described in section 3261(a) of this title.

June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 685; July 12, 1952, ch. 695, 66 Stat. 589; Pub. L. 97–96, § 6, Dec. 21, 1981, 95 Stat. 1210; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 1210, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2164; Pub. L. 103–322, title XII, § 120002, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2021; Pub. L. 107–56, title VIII, § 804, Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 377.
And another reply
We may have consolation in these verses Larry.

Psalms 2:1-4 Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision.

Psalms 73:3-17 For I was envious at the foolish, when I saw the prosperity of the wicked. For there are no bands in their death: but their strength is firm. They are not in trouble as other men; neither are they plagued like other men. Therefore pride compasseth them about as a chain; violence covereth them as a garment. Their eyes stand out with fatness: they have more than heart could wish. They are corrupt, and speak wickedly concerning oppression: they speak loftily. They set their mouth against the heavens, and their tongue walketh through the earth. Therefore his people return hither: and waters of a full cup are wrung out to them. And they say, How doth God know? and is there knowledge in the most High? Behold, these are the ungodly, who prosper in the world; they increase in riches. Verily I have cleansed my heart in vain, and washed my hands in innocency. For all the day long have I been plagued, and chastened every morning. If I say, I will speak thus; behold, I should offend against the generation of thy children. When I thought to know this, it was too painful for me; Until I went into the sanctuary of God; then understood I, their end.

Let’s keep our eyes on the bigger picture.
Free Rad, the Ned