30 – Treason big time in Britain

In Australia (at least) … Treasury seems to be the culprit, but isn’t treasury just a lot of public servants who are replaced from time to time by successive governments?   There would have to be some shadowy authority or organisation behind the scenes and it’s hard to imagine that so many people employed by treasury would be able or want to keep silent.    Yes  there is a  shadowy authority or organisation – see the Extreme Oath on ….. https://larryhannigan.com/courts/14b-affidavit-in-support-of-notice/

see more of their activities in Australia after the Britain article

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Britain and the Almighty in Covenant Bond
The Irish Taoiseach, Leo Varadkar TD, interviewed at the EU Gothenburg Social Summit on 17 November, 2017 (accession of Elizabe th I   in 1558), said that Britain’s Brexit negotiations with the EU are ‘a divorce’ process.Constitutionally, for this to be a divorce process, there has of necessity to have been a lawful marriage in the first instance. In all reality what developed in 1972-73, was not a marriage of the United Kingdom with the then EEC, but an unconstitutional liaison.

This ‘marriage’ with alien powers did not comply with our national covenants under the Coronation Oath 1953 (Act) and the many great statutes of the Realm, as none of them were repealed, causing an ever-increasing conflict on the Statute Book. This process of political stealth undermined the constitution which according to R v Thistlewood 1820 is an act of treason.

Treason by installments, or a slow coup d’ état, is not the basis for lawful marriage, especially if it is a bigamous one in the first place, which Britain’s membership of the EU became through deception at the highest political lever under the Heath Administration and under all subsequent Administrations. Constitutionally, the Crown has been ‘deceived in its grants’.

Over the subsequent 44 years and particularly since 1992 in respect of the political union under the Maastricht Treaty, Britain has been a state of national unfaithfulness to its lawful husband – ‘the Queen-in-Parliament under God’.
Thus, what is happening in the Brexit negotiations is not a divorce, but the annulment of a state of national adultery and the return of the nation to our lawful marital state under the British Constitution.

The Leave vote, evidenced in pre-vision by the prophet Hosea, was fulfilled to great surprise. The distant future of the Ten Tribed kingdom of the House of Israel, was illustrated by Hosea’s personal marriage trauma.
On 23 June, 2016, it was said by the nation in an historic moment of Divine Providence:
‘I will go and return to my first husband;
for then was it better with me than now’ (Hosea 2:7).
The LORD is bringing the nation back into ‘the bond’ of His covenant with the United Kingdom of Britain-Israel (Ezekiel 20:37).

BRITAIN IS NOT PART OF THE EU, AT LAW –
It has been undermined by treason in installments!
The European Communities Act received Royal Assent on 17 October 1972.
This Act resulted in the United Kingdom joining the European Economic Community (EEC), which had been established by the Treaty of Rome, signed on 25 March 1957.

Britain officially became a member of the EEC on 1 January 1973.
This state of constitutional illegality was ultimately entrenched on 19 June, 2008, when Royal Assent was given to the Constitutional Treaty of Lisbon.
This final Treaty of the now political European Union was ratified by all member states of the European Union on 13 November, 2009.

When he signed the Treaty of Accession to the Treaty of Rome in Brussels on 22 January, 1972, the then Prime Minister, Edward Heath, knowingly and wilfully tricked, deceived and betrayed the British people into foreign rule by the EEC/EU under the pretence that they would be joining a European common trading agreement, known then as the Common Market. The true intention was to surrender Britain’s sovereignty. He deliberately lied to the country. For that reason alone under English Law, The ECA 1972 is void and of no effect.

At law his was the most calculating and grievous High Treason in British history. He gave away his country. Upon this signing, his treason instantly removed him from lawful office and his treasonous act failed to become lawfully binding because treason has no legitimacy and cannot do that. It is not possible to make law by breaking the law. Edward Heath’s then treasonous administration immediately became an unlawful assembly as a treasonous government is not lawful and has no legitimacy.

No parliament can bind a successor, yet no following parliament has ever reversed Edward Heath’s treachery. Instead, every following prime minister and parliament has consciously and deliberately acted to reinforce Heath’s outrageous pretence that Britain had knowingly and willingly consented to foreign rule. As public servants, neither he nor they ever had such authority and their actions are highly treasonous contrary to English law for acting against the nation’s known interests, intending to surrender its sovereignty, using wilful deception to deliberately betray the nation and for acting in the political interests of a foreign power. It is effectively to declare war on the British Crown and the nation and is treason contrary to the Treason Act 1351 and the Treason Felony Act 1848.

Every United Kingdom parliament since 1972 therefore, is and has been at law, an unlawful assembly. With no legitimacy and in knowingly committing the most evil act of treason against their own people, each has invited and imposed foreign rule over their own country. Since 1972, not one has acted within the law. Having solemnly sworn lifetime oaths of loyalty and allegiance to The Queen to serve and protect Britain, each has conspired in this treason and they persist in deceitfully concealing the truth of their illicit activities from the public as it has long been known that the British people would never accept it and would object most violently were they ever to find out.

But they are finding out. Parliaments’ history of treason and corruption is a matter of public record with an increasing number of research documents, newspaper and magazine articles, TV documentaries and an overwhelming amount of Foreign and Commonwealth Office documentary evidence released to the public domain.
Over 600 pages of it can be downloaded and read at http://www.englishconstitutiongroup.org/downloads/treason-relateddownloads
and this evidence is also verified in Hansard with a full and complete record of politicians’ statements.

No law or other binding obligation can result from treason or intent by an unlawful assembly. English law, therefore, stands as it was prior to signing of the 1972 Act. Thus Britain is not and can never have been part of the European Union as every Act, EU Treaty and every statute since 1972 whether or not given the Royal Assent, is treasonous, unlawful, null and void. Not one has the force of law. In any case, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969 provides that a signatory power may abrogate any treaty unilaterally where corruption can be demonstrated in respect of procuring the treaty in the first place or in respect of any dimension of its implementation. This means that the known and proven treason by Heath and his successors and the widely recognized and often reported deep corruption within the EU render every EU Treaty “signed” by Britain, invalid.

The European Union has no legitimate influence in Britain whatsoever. Neither does its (Napoleonic) European Civil Law. Their authority exists only in the minds of certain politicians in furtherance of the political agenda of the EU. Britain may walk away at any time without a second thought as she is not lawfully part of it under the British Constitution.

The supremacy of English law in Britain automatically intercedes and strikes down any attempt to repeal, subvert, overrule or replace it. The deceit, pretence and false enforcement of Britain’s “European involvement” is none other than parliamentary make-believe and pure theatre designed at the highest levels to deceive and subjugate the people to foreign rule against their will for others’ political purpose contrary to English Common Law. It is wilful treason.

A succession of unlawful British parliaments therefore, having no legitimacy, illegally and without mandate, wilfully and criminally imported and imposed upon their own people, foreign rule and influence that has no authority in Britain.
English Constitutional and Common Law is beyond parliamentary reach to alter or repeal and cannot be ignored. Parts are, in any case, by contract directly between the Monarch (the Crown) and the people. Thus Parliament is not party to those arrangements and can have no input. Importantly, this English law is immutable and in perpetuity, written specifically to forever protect the British people from despotic governance.

Even Her Majesty The Queen cannot change or ignore these laws as she is herself subject to them. She cannot surrender Britain’s sovereignty that she holds in trust from the British people, for her successors. Neither can she relinquish Britain’s independence and freedom of self determination to a foreign power. Her solemn obligation is to protect and preserve the United Kingdom for her successors, as she received it. What she cannot do, her servants in Parliament also cannot do.

A succession of British parliaments has since 1972 attempted to do the very things The Queen cannot. In so doing, each has placed themselves above The Queen which is to imagine her abdication, or death. Each of these acts is the most serious treason contrary to the Treason Act 1351. Thus their treason is compound in plotting and attempting to give away their country and in considering themselves above The Queen whose abdication or death they casually assume.

The Common Law imposes strict and enduring duties upon every British subject from birth. Every British subject is duty bound in allegiance and loyalty to the nation and in the reporting and prevention of treason. These obligations are absolute and inseparable wherever one may be around the world and cannot be resigned except by renouncing British nationality. They far pre-date the Bill of Rights 1689 which protects Britain from all foreign influence or rule by any power or authority: “No foreign Prince, person, Prelate, State, or Potentate, hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction, Power, Superiority, Pre eminence, or Authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realm”.

The United Kingdom’s pretended EU membership is contrary to (among others) the Treason Act 1351, the Act of Supremacy 1559, the Declaration and Bill of Rights 1689 and the Treason Felony Act 1848. These laws, remember, are beyond the reach of Parliament to amend, repeal or to disregard and just because modern day lawyers are not trained in these laws does not mean they do not exist or that serious offences against them have not been and are not committed. Under the Act of Settlement 1700 S4, these English Constitutional and Common Laws are the birthright of the people and cannot be taken away.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx